Paysite-Tryout

If you have an opinion about this site then here's your chance to adjust ours.

1 2 3 4 5

The sites are all quite good reality porn sites. The models are mostly good-looking, and the action is hot. There is a shitload of content on many of the sites. Some are old, so in spite of updates only being posted once a week on most sites, they have had years to build a large archive.

The girls / models are all 100% amateur, you won't find a single girl you've seen before. -At least I didn't, and I've seen my share of porn, plus I've actually been a member of these sites for 8 months, so I think I would have noticed if there were any "names". A thing I've experienced a lot recently on other sites, and find to be a bit of a turn-off, is when they use some washed out hooker, obviously high on something, and try to go along with a script. She's looking like she couldn't give a rats ass, just doing her thing and waiting to be paid. -Not sexy!
Anyway my point here was that I've never had that feeling with any of the ND-videos.

The script for almost all of the sites go like this: "Boy walks down street and sees girl. Boy talks to girl. Both go to the pad, and, like everyone who just met, they have sex..." Not especially original, except for the fact that these sites were some of the first to use that script. Nowadays it's the basic script of nearly all amateur sites, but it's still cool enough, and some of the videos on these sites actually almost convinces me :)
-In other words I think they are more credible than your average reality site...

All videos and pictures are 100% exclusive, which means they were made for the site they're on. -Unlike most sites that claim 100% exclusive content, these sites actually keep that promise. Apart from the obvious fact that you won't find these videos anywhere else, it also means that you get meaningful descriptions of the scenes, from the people who actually made them.

A general complaint about these sites (along with most reality sites) is that the videos are simply too long, 15 minute introduction and 30-45 minutes of fucking... Cut the videos for crying out loud, it's boring to watch those long uninterrupted sequences with stale camera angles and the same position. That being said I think that most of the ND-sites actually do well on keeping the videos exciting, considering how long they are (40-60 minutes normally)

You do not get any real bonuses when joining this network. -Except access to all other sites, that is! They have a few ads, but aren't aggressively promoting anything, so I don't mind. One bonus that is offered though, is 4 weekly 2 hour live shows, all from the lesbian sites.

Most of the sites are updated every monday with one picture set and one video (of the same girl), the video is split into 3 smaller clips, posted monday, wednesday and friday. Some sites have stopped updating, but around 15 are still updated every week, and that's a lot of fresh content.

The quality of content on these sites vary a lot, but everything is acceptable, and the newer stuff is actually mostly above the average by todays standards. However some of these sites go back like 5 years, and back then the technology wasn't as good as it is now, and therefore some content is below todays standard. I'll describe the quality of the content that is new in this section, but keep in mind that it isn't nescessarily all as good.

Videos are available split into 1-minute bites for streaming in two qualities, the best being 480x360 (quite good), and for download in MPEG format, also 480x360. They are also available for download in either ASF or WMV format, split into 3 big clips of about 60 MB and 15 minutes on average, again the resolution is 480x360.

Pictures also vary greatly, some sites offer almost exclusively video-caps, lifted from the videos and maybe enhanced a little. Other times you find real pictures taken with a real camera. However there are no high resolution pictures, the best I've seen is 800x600. They are OK as an extra, but not nearly good enough, resolution-wise and photo-technically, to be of much value on their own.

Each of the smaller video-clips has it's own large thumbnail to make it easy for people on slow modems to get just the files they want. Pictures are of course also individually thumbnailed. Picture updates can be downloaded in their entirity in a ZIP-file, from within each gallery.

Navigation is simple, and it works. There really aren't many sections to navigate, basically everything is on the main page. The design is terrible, very amateur, but I don't care. As long as it's easy to get an overview, and the content is good, the design doesn't matter. IMHO it does however take a few too many clicks to get from one update to the next.

Please let me know which reviews you find most useful by rating each after reading them. I you have further comments you can use the form below.

1 2 3 4 5