Mini-stats
Lesbo 101
2 hot lesbian girls introduce girls to the joys of girl-girl sex.
Rate Lesbo 101
If you have an opinion about this site then here's your chance to adjust ours.
Shortcuts
Review of Lesbo 101
Posted on 2006-03-07 by Manzano
In a nutshell
- Well-done young lesbian porn, nothing especially remarkable about it though... Tripods are sometimes used, and that's a turnoff for me.
- Slightly above average quality.
- Pricing: $24-$30 per month, depending on subscription duration. Includes full access to 3 non-lesbian sites at the time of writing. Has a relatively large archive, and frequent updates.
- Updates are consistently posted every 3 days, which is absolutely acceptable for an amateur / reality / niche-site.
- I can't say I'm 100% sure, but I think a small part of the videos aren't exclusive. Other than that promises are kept.
- Simple and it works.
- I hate the way movies are downloaded, but other than that it works, and the site speed is good.
- Good, but not overwhelmingly big lesbian amateur site. Worth at least one months subscription.
My opinion
This is a standard lesbian amateur reality site if such a thing exists. Come to think about it I actually don't know a single site apart from this one that I would describe like that, but: "standard lesbian" because the action is regular old-fashioned lesbian porn, "amateur" because the girls are (mostly) amateurs or even first-timers, "reality" because the basic principles of most reality sites apply to the concept of this one. They want to give an impression of the models having their first lesbian experience, I doubt that is true for most of the models, but it is very possible that these videos are the first time the girls are doing it on camera. Anyway, I guess most of you folks know how real reality sites are, if not then I do apologize for disapointing you :)
The difference between this site and many other lesbian sites is that it is made and filmed by two french-canadian girls, Sarah and Gabriella. -That's right, this is not some sleazy guy with a camera, it's two sleazy girls... IMO that makes a lot of difference to the final product. It's refreshing to see women make porn :)
The concept is basically that they take in unexperienced girls and teach them how to make lesbian porn. On one hand I think that's great, I love to see "new, true" amateur models. On the other hand they are inexperienced, so often they don't have a clue what they're doing, and there is a lot of communication in places you would normally expect non-stop action. When I watched the first video from this site I noticed that I had never seen a porn-clip where the sentence "Does this hurt?" was repeated as often. There is also the disadvantage that when the "instructor-slash-camera-girl" joins in the action that leaves the camera unattended, and long boring sequences occur. -In the end it's up to you to decide: If you love real amateur lesbians, then it's great. If you love near-pro lesbian porn then it's annoying.
Most of the episodes I saw featured one first-timer and one girl who had already appeared on the site, or in some other way made lesbian porn previously. Gabriella would instruct, mostly in english, but sometimes in french (the site, and the network is french canadian).
Video action is regular lesbian sex: Licking, sucking, fingering rubbing, toy play and strap-on pounding. Standard lesbian sex, good, but nothing remarkable about it. The girls are super hot, which is one thing all of the sites in this network has in common. It seems that girls from french canada are simply way hotter than girls from other places :)
I can't say for sure, but some of the videos seem much more professional, has background music and altogther just look very different from the majority, so I'm guessing that not all the videos are 100% exclusive as the tour claims, but then again: the majority is...
Like all other sites in this network you get access to lots of off-site bonus material, some streaming videos, live cams, adult games and other feeds. You also get access to the networks shared picture-gallery that holds a shitload of content from many different niches. -But most is straight.
Finally you get full access to at 3 other sites, strangely enough not including any of the other lesbian sites from the network. One of the bonus sites is hardcore-training, a site with a similar concept except it is straight.
The difference between this site and many other lesbian sites is that it is made and filmed by two french-canadian girls, Sarah and Gabriella. -That's right, this is not some sleazy guy with a camera, it's two sleazy girls... IMO that makes a lot of difference to the final product. It's refreshing to see women make porn :)
The concept is basically that they take in unexperienced girls and teach them how to make lesbian porn. On one hand I think that's great, I love to see "new, true" amateur models. On the other hand they are inexperienced, so often they don't have a clue what they're doing, and there is a lot of communication in places you would normally expect non-stop action. When I watched the first video from this site I noticed that I had never seen a porn-clip where the sentence "Does this hurt?" was repeated as often. There is also the disadvantage that when the "instructor-slash-camera-girl" joins in the action that leaves the camera unattended, and long boring sequences occur. -In the end it's up to you to decide: If you love real amateur lesbians, then it's great. If you love near-pro lesbian porn then it's annoying.
Most of the episodes I saw featured one first-timer and one girl who had already appeared on the site, or in some other way made lesbian porn previously. Gabriella would instruct, mostly in english, but sometimes in french (the site, and the network is french canadian).
Video action is regular lesbian sex: Licking, sucking, fingering rubbing, toy play and strap-on pounding. Standard lesbian sex, good, but nothing remarkable about it. The girls are super hot, which is one thing all of the sites in this network has in common. It seems that girls from french canada are simply way hotter than girls from other places :)
I can't say for sure, but some of the videos seem much more professional, has background music and altogther just look very different from the majority, so I'm guessing that not all the videos are 100% exclusive as the tour claims, but then again: the majority is...
Like all other sites in this network you get access to lots of off-site bonus material, some streaming videos, live cams, adult games and other feeds. You also get access to the networks shared picture-gallery that holds a shitload of content from many different niches. -But most is straight.
Finally you get full access to at 3 other sites, strangely enough not including any of the other lesbian sites from the network. One of the bonus sites is hardcore-training, a site with a similar concept except it is straight.
Tech-stuff
The videos come in one average quality, WMV format. Resolution is 320x240 or 352x240 which is average. IMO the photo-technical side is better than most reality sites though, the picture is always sharp and well-lit. I also feel like they're better quality than the resolution normally offers, maybe less compressed. They are available for download or streaming. Movies are cut into 3-8 smaller clips.
There are 4 thumbnails for each clip, unfortunately they aren't always accurate, f.ex. there may be a thumb from clip 2 displayed with clip 1... Updates also has 20-60 full sized vid-caps attached, so you can preview the action before downloading.
One thing I hate is the way downloadable movies are downloaded. I don't know how or why, but the links do not point directly to the files, but instead to some sort of script that redirects to the videos. That makes it impossible to use a download manager, which IMO is very useful for porn.
At the time of writing the archive holds 165 video updates. The non-exclusive picture-gallery has a lot (a lot!) of pictures, the 10.000 claim is probably true, they just aren't all lesbian. They are well-organised and good quality, but no way to download them is offered. -Other than one by one of course :)
There are 4 thumbnails for each clip, unfortunately they aren't always accurate, f.ex. there may be a thumb from clip 2 displayed with clip 1... Updates also has 20-60 full sized vid-caps attached, so you can preview the action before downloading.
One thing I hate is the way downloadable movies are downloaded. I don't know how or why, but the links do not point directly to the files, but instead to some sort of script that redirects to the videos. That makes it impossible to use a download manager, which IMO is very useful for porn.
At the time of writing the archive holds 165 video updates. The non-exclusive picture-gallery has a lot (a lot!) of pictures, the 10.000 claim is probably true, they just aren't all lesbian. They are well-organised and good quality, but no way to download them is offered. -Other than one by one of course :)
Conclusion
The site offers good on-the-point lesbian amateur sex, and IMHO it is refreshing to see women make porn instead of just staring in it. I think the site is well worth a subscription, but on the other hand it isn't in any way outstanding. Not being a lesbian myself (duh!) I can't say for sure, but I imagine it could actually appeal to women.
Beware when you visit that the network Lesbo101 is part of has one of the most annoying and aggressive console / popup systems I've ever seen... Expect to be bombarded with popups and have all open windows hi-jacked when you take the tour. There are of course no such annoyances once you're a member...
Beware when you visit that the network Lesbo101 is part of has one of the most annoying and aggressive console / popup systems I've ever seen... Expect to be bombarded with popups and have all open windows hi-jacked when you take the tour. There are of course no such annoyances once you're a member...
Was this useful?









0 Comments on "Review of Lesbo 101"
Add comment