Paysite-Tryout

If you have an opinion about this site then here's your chance to adjust ours.

1 2 3 4 5

When buying access to any of the four sites covered in this review, you get access to the members areas of the other three as well. HighDefMoviePass has no real niche, the only theme of the site is HD movies. HighDefBlowJobs offer blowjob videos, HighDefCumswap offers cumswap videos and HighDefAssFucking obviously focuses on anal sex, in fact the names are quite well chosen :)

I would consider all four as one site, and say that the niche is simply good studio-produced professional hardcore porn. -The same sort of thing you'd find on DVD in your local rental. Many of the models are high-profile professional porn stars: Jenaveve Jolie, Monica Sweetheart, Lanny Barbi and Alexis Amore, to mention a few of the babes I recognized. There are no ugly models on any of these sites. -That, combined with the fact that all videos are well-produced, means that every minute of video is worth watching.

There are 22 videos on HighDefAssFucking, 19 on HighDefMoviePass, 15 on HighDefBlowJobs and 15 on HighDefCumSwap. In addition to those there are 3 true HD movies that are available on all four sites. That is a total of 74 videos, around 35 hours of entertainment. That is not a breathtaking amount of video for the price, but considering the fact that all of them are watch-worthy, it is acceptable. There are no pictures except in the bonus feeds.

All of the videos I saw were pretty hardcore. Many feature threesomes and foursomes, including really rough blowjobs, deepthroat and of course a great deal of both hard, deep ass pounding and cumswapping videos. The sites all hit their niche's well, but since only around 20 videos are offered on each site I cannot consider them seperately.

The tour describes a quick-jerk feature, which IMO is a super idea. I am one of the people who often get bored of long scenes, and wish someone would cut them into a fast-paced compilation. That is exactly what the quick-jerk feature is supposed to do, and it is supposed to be updated every week. Actually the only thing I don't like about the feature is that it isn't there ! -The button is there, but all you get from clicking it is a message that "There are currently no clips available.".

As a member you also get access to a lot of plugins and feeds which all seem OK, but as usual I don't count them as being part of the site. They did seem to be good quality, and some seemed very interesting. In particular I found the "balloon babes" very funny and exciting. The feeds never receive more than a single line in my reviews, so all I'll say is that there are a lot, and many seem good.

The actual quality of videos is good: Camera-technique, lighting focus etc. is all very professional. All the videos are studio-produced, professionally filmed, and all together look good. That being said they do not deserve to have the high definition term attached to them. HD means very high resolution, but only very few videos offer true high definition. Most of the videos are offered in 640x480 resolution as the best option, and while that is clear, even in full screen, it is not HD !

Videos are typically offered in 3 qualities in WMV format, and 2 qualitites in MOV format. Some are available only in their full length, while others are available only in 4-8 smaller clips, and others again are available in in both full and chopped-up clips. The same goes for the formats. The few real high definition movies are offered in a blasting resolution of 1280x720, which is a widescreen format, and extremely clear.

One good point about the sites is that all videos are offered for both download and streaming. However they do not allow download managers. -A rule that I simply ignore, but then again I don't have to worry about my subscription being cancelled. If I were you I would respect the rule, although I don't appreciate that sort of limitations. Another annoyance about downloading is that filenames are identical for many updates, which means you can't save them in the same folder without renaming them individually.

The design of the sites is very streamlined, and looks good. It also offers simple navigation, and the only complaint I have in this department, is that the video download pages are not all the same, and on some it is nescessary to actually click on each small clip and go to a page where it starts streaming before you can download the clip. The sites are relatively small, so most links point to feeds, actually all the "real" content is available directly from the front page. The feeds take up all other "sections", but since they're clearly seperated from the actual content I don't find that to be a problem.

Please let me know which reviews you find most useful by rating each after reading them. I you have further comments you can use the form below.

1 2 3 4 5